Comments on: Infographic Design | Where To Be Born – a change from 1988 to 2013

By: monika

monika — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:37:17 +0000

pretty sad for Germany, how can we improve?

By: Gerli

Gerli — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:44:50 +0000

not impressed that nordic country Estonia is 44th:(

By: Adam Meister

Adam Meister — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:07:09 +0000

You skipped Uruguay in 2013. It should be on the list.

By: The Ranking Of Best Countries To Be Born Has Changed A Lot In 25 Years [Infographic] | Investors Daily

Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:07:56 +0000

[...] an infographics and data visualization outfit based outside London, has put together a great repackaging of the data, which also included the list from [...]

By: The Ranking Of Best Countries To Be Born Has Changed A Lot In 25 Years [Infographic] | The Las Angeles Times

Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:20:25 +0000

[...] an infograficz an' data visualizashun outfit base' outside London, haz put togetha a great repackagn' uv da data, wich also include' da lis' from [...]

By: plop

plop — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:46:09 +0000

The economist… come on…

By: Matt

Matt — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:31:36 +0000

Nice illustration. Pity most of it is meaningless.

Ireland above Japan, S Korea, UK and France ?

By: WOND

WOND — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:01:44 +0000

> So the top 7 in 1988 have fallen pretty far.
> Singapore has rocketed up from 36th to 6th!
> The scandinavian countries are doing excellently with Norway leading the bunch. Must be all quality mineral water, hot springs and other sort after natural resources.
> Nigeria is the worst place to be born and Switzerland the best.
> The USSR and Yugoslavia has split up since the 1988 ‘Where To Be Born’ Index.
> Taiwan shows a lot of promise in 14th.
> The US has crashed from 1st to joint 16th!
> Belgium hasn’t move an inch.
> And Netherlands are doing pretty good in 8th even with their special smoking cafes in Amsterdam!!